Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 8:36:18 GMT
Already 50 articles posted online”. . Alain: “how do you know? yet they went to look at the requests of Internet users”. When Alain asks them for explanations, the answer is simple: “it takes time”. Sure, it takes time, but not that much. If the service provider you work with tells you: “we have no results in 1 year because it takes time”, look elsewhere. This doesn't necessarily mean that he's bad, but in any case, he doesn't know how to handle your problem. In this case, for Alain, the lack of results is not a problem of time. It is directly linked to the work of the agency: His site is not authoritative enough. The site is very poorly referenced. It's not all about creating “inbound” articles, you also need to reference them.
They will not be visible through the “magic” of social networks. 90% of visitors to the site are Email Data people who already know them. It is therefore not useful for acquiring new customers. The remaining 10% come mostly for the wrong reasons. The agency's articles are much too short (we don't do SEO with 600-word articles). The article pages are also not authoritarian. No conversion “booster” tool is in place. The service provider “went to look at what Internet users are typing”. This argument, if I don't hear it every day, I hear it every week. This is a pretty difficult argument to counter without getting too technical. Very often, the service provider has limited itself to taking a look at a free Google tool, accessible to everyone: “Google Keyword Planner”. Certainly it is better than nothing, but it is incomplete and imprecise.
Google Keyword Planner can be of good assistance, but it remains difficult to use effectively for natural referencing. And yet, the site is on the 1st page: the case of Yves Yves has me on a date (in real life, Yves is not called Yves). He's a prospect. He is a Sales Director and agreed to meet with me at the request of the Marketing Director, who attended one of my conferences during a trade show. Finally, the entire company board is there. Yves speaks and explains that the company is in 1st position for a keyword that seems important to them. He didn't miss his effect. Their colleagues are literally impressed: their brand is in first position in a query that describes their expertise well! Yves is jubilant about the reaction of his colleagues. The problem: no one is searching for the keyword in question.
They will not be visible through the “magic” of social networks. 90% of visitors to the site are Email Data people who already know them. It is therefore not useful for acquiring new customers. The remaining 10% come mostly for the wrong reasons. The agency's articles are much too short (we don't do SEO with 600-word articles). The article pages are also not authoritarian. No conversion “booster” tool is in place. The service provider “went to look at what Internet users are typing”. This argument, if I don't hear it every day, I hear it every week. This is a pretty difficult argument to counter without getting too technical. Very often, the service provider has limited itself to taking a look at a free Google tool, accessible to everyone: “Google Keyword Planner”. Certainly it is better than nothing, but it is incomplete and imprecise.
Google Keyword Planner can be of good assistance, but it remains difficult to use effectively for natural referencing. And yet, the site is on the 1st page: the case of Yves Yves has me on a date (in real life, Yves is not called Yves). He's a prospect. He is a Sales Director and agreed to meet with me at the request of the Marketing Director, who attended one of my conferences during a trade show. Finally, the entire company board is there. Yves speaks and explains that the company is in 1st position for a keyword that seems important to them. He didn't miss his effect. Their colleagues are literally impressed: their brand is in first position in a query that describes their expertise well! Yves is jubilant about the reaction of his colleagues. The problem: no one is searching for the keyword in question.